№4 (29) / 2025  

Release Date 10.11.2025

 HISTORY OF THOUGHT

 

 

Maslov Gleb

PhD (Economy), Senior Research Fellow at the Center for Methodological and Historical-Economic Research

Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences (Moscow), This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4955-2303

 

RESEARCH ON SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNOLOGICAL PROGRESS AND THEORIES OF TECHNICAL AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT IN THE WORKS OF YU. OLSEVICH

Размер файла105-116
Размер файла  166 К Размер файла Text of the Article   License Creative Commons 4.0 

The article dedicated to the 95th anniversary of the Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences is devoted to the theoretical legacy of Yu.Ya. Olsevich, one of the Institute's leading experts on the impact of scientific and technological progress on the transformation of socio-economic systems. Special attention is paid to the developed Yu. Olsevich concepts of the infra-industry. Foreign theories were criticized for not paying enough attention to the main directions of scientific and technological progress in various socio-economic systems. When analyzing the Soviet experience, Yu. Olsevich highlighted the problems of over-centralization, largely due to the permanent confrontation with the Western bloc, which corresponded to the approaches of many Western Sovietologists. The current stage of social development is characterized by the special role of the infra-industry, a subsystem of productive forces that unites various industries. In addition to highlighting the progressive potential of the scientific and technological revolution, Yu. Olsevich noted a number of risks, primarily related to increasing inequality and environmental problems. It is shown that the modern technical and economic system is characterized by an increase in the socialization of production, which implies the development of state planning mechanisms. At the same time, the complexity of production processes implies maintaining the complexity of the economy. The article notes that the development of the legacy of Yu. Olsevich's work is becoming particularly relevant at the present time.

 

Keywords: scientific and technological progress, scientific and technological revolution, Marxism, infra-industry, multiplicity

 

JEL: B31, O33

UDC: 330.858, 330.88

DOI: 10.52342/2587-7666VTE_2025_4_105_116

 

© G. Maslov, 2025

© Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences «Issues of Theoretical Economics», 2025

Acknowledgments: The author thanks G.D. Gloveli, Head of the Center for Methodological and Historical-Economic Research at the Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences, for his assistance in preparing this article.

 

ЛИТЕРАТУРА

  1. Bobylev S.N., Zavyalova T.V. (2024). Sustainable development: searching for a new economy. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.13895628.
  2. Glazyev S. Yu., Lvov D. S. (1986). Theoretical and Applied Aspects of Scientific and Technical Progress Management.
  3. Gloveli G.J. (2025). The First Industrial Revolutions and Russian Schools of Economic Thought. DOI: 10.52180/2073-6487_2025_2_25_51.
  4. Galbraith J. K. (1969). The New Industrial State.
  5. Dynkin A.A. (1991). A New Stage of Scientific and Technological Progress: The Economic Content and Mechanism of Implementation in the Capitalist Economy. EDN: THMUVZ

complete reference list

close list

  1. Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences in Persons: Collection / Ed. by M.I. Voeykov.
  2. Kolganov A.I. (2017). What Does Psychology Provide for Understanding Economic Processes? (On the Yu.Ya. Olsevich's Book «Psychological Foundations of Economic Behavior»). EDN: LBGRIL
  3. Olsevich Ya. (1987). Criticism of Anti–Marxist Views on the problems of the Scientific and Technical Revolution.
  4. Olsevich Yu.Ya. (1989). Paradoxes or New Trends: On the Unity and Pluralism of Industrial Forms.
  5. Olsevich Yu.Ya. (1994а). Transformation of Economic Systems (Collection of Articles).
  6. Olsevich Yu.Ya. (1994b). Economic Concepts of Sovietology: Stages and Discussions.
  7. Olsevich Yu.Ya. (1997). Monetarism and Russia: Problems of Compatibility.
  8. Olsevich Yu.Ya. The Impact of Economic Reforms in Russia and China on Western Economic Thought.
  9. Olsevich Yu.Ya. (2008). On the Psychogenetic and Psychosocial Foundations of Economic Behavior.
  10. Olsevich Yu.Ya. (2009). Psychological Foundations of Economic Behavior.
  11. Olshevich Yu.Ya. (2014). Social and Psychological Aspects of Technological Development of the System.
  12. Toffler A. (2010). The Third Wave.
  13. Kheinman A. (1962). Creation of the Material and Technical Base of Communism and the Scientific and Technical Revolution.
  14. Grullon G., Larkin Y., Michaely R. (2019). Are US Industries Becoming More Concentrated? // Review of Finance. 23. No. 4. Pp. 697-743.
  15. Milonakis D., Fine B. (2009). From Political Economy to Economics: Method, the Social and the Historical in the Evolution of Economic Theory. – London, New York: Routledge.

 

 

Manuscript submission date  21.07.2025

Manuscript acceptance date: 06.09.2025

 

For citation: 

Maslov G. Research on Scientific and Technological Progress and Theories of Technical and Economic Development in the Works of Yu. Olsevich // Voprosy teoreticheskoy ekonomiki. 2025. No. 4. Pp. 105–116. DOI: 10.52342/2587- 7666VTE_2025_4_105_116.