№2 (31) / 2026 Full issue

Release Date 25.05.2026

 INTERDISCIPLINARY STUDIES

 

 

 

Medushevskiy Andrei

Doctor of Science (Philosophy), Tenured Professor

Higher School of Economics (Moscow)

This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4314-662X

 

VIRTUE AND VICE: ETHICAL CODES OF MARGINAL COMMUNITIES IN MODERN RUSSIA (PART 2)

Размер файла146-164
Размер файла 216 KB
  License Creative Commons 4.0 
 JATS XML

It is generally accepted that the basis of social and legal stability in any society is a consensus on virtue - the fundamental values of proper behavior, ways of maintaining and reproducing them. And, conversely, the destruction of this consensus is a sign of the loss of stability and divergence of positions of social institutions, groups and professional communities in understanding and applying norms and sanctions for their violation. This schematic representation poorly explains the parameters of the moral crisis of the era of globalization: the reasons for the loss of the meaning of the concept of virtue as the basis of the moral universe of humanity; the rejection of universal moral standards previously supported by religion or ideology, the growing conflict of their interpretations in different cultures, confessional and ethnic communities, the confrontation of value hierarchies within national cultures and individual groups, and most importantly - the lack of common moral guidelines of what to strive for.

In these conditions, the dominant global trend has become the appeal to the codification of norms of so-called “pragmatic ethics” – the development of various codes of proper behavior for individual social and professional groups, which in this way seek to express their identity, functions and place in the dynamics of changes in the social hierarchy. This general fashion for the creation of ethical codes has captured post-Soviet Russia and is considered almost a panacea for moral distortions and the basis for effective social regulation. Meanwhile, the codification of ethical standards of all social subcultures without exception means a tacit recognition of both their insurmountable contradictions and that part of them that does not share conventional standards of virtue or clearly rebels against them.

On this basis, the phenomenon of moral anomie (that is, the destruction of the entire normative system) and the justification of non-conformist and immoral behavior arises. What should be the parameters and limits of its acceptance in a democratic society, and most importantly – who sets them? This range of problems becomes the subject of analysis for the first time in this article, based on the entire corpus of the latest ethical codes of marginal communities in modern Russia.

 

Keywords: virtue, vice, faith and reason, ethical codes, conformist, deviant and criminal behavior, nihilism, amoralism, moral mysophobia, moral insanity, marginal communities of Russia

JEL: K14, K15, L84, Z00

UDC: 172, 177, 34.096, 392, 393.05

DOI: 10.52342/2587-7666VTE_2026_2_146_164

 

© А. Medushevskiy, 2026

© Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences «Issues of Theoretical Economics», 2026

  

REFERENCES

  1. Adler A. (2023). Understanding human nature. – M.: AST. (In Russ.).

  2. Bekhterev V.M. (2021). Phenomena of the brain. – M.: AST. (In Russ.).

  3. Belova N.A., Kolyutskaya E.V. (2012). The Phenomenon of «Moral Mysophobia» in the Clinic of Schizophrenia // Journal of Neurology and Psychiatry. No. 6. Pp. 13-17. (In Russ.).

  4. Eco U. (2025). The story of ugliness. – M.: Slovo  (In Russ.).

  5. Freemasonry in its Past and Present (1991): In 2 vols. – M.: JV "IKPA". (In Russ.).

complete reference list

close list

  1. Galaguza N. (2020). Ethical code of insurers // Sovremennyye strakhovyye tekhnologii (Modern insurance technologies). No. 6 (83). Pp.46-49. (In Russ.).

  2. Grigoryan V.L., Dmitriev V.I. (2004). Piracy, Robbery and Terrorism at Sea. – М.: Akademkniga. (In Russ.).

  3. Kazantsev M.F. (2006). A Pact with the Devil: Myth or Reality (An Attempt at Discursive-Legal Analysis) // Discourse of Modern Mythologies. Issue 6: Scientific and Practical Almanac.– Ekaterinburg: Institute of Philosophy and Law, Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Pp.123-127. (In Russ.).

  4. Khimanen P. (2001). Hacker Ethics and the Spirit of Informationalism. – M.: AST. (In Russ.).

  5. Landberg F. (1971). The Rich and the Super-Rich. About the Real Rulers of the USA. – М.: Progress. (In Russ.).

  6. Malinowskiy B. (1998). Magic, Science and Religion. – М.: Рefl-book. (In Russ.).

  7. Medushevsky A. (2025). Law and morality: ethical codes as an instrument of public legal policy of Russia // Comparative constitutional review. Vol. 34. No. 4. Pp. 135–166. (In Russ.).

  8. Medushevsky A.N. (2026). Virtue and vice: ethical codes of marginal communities of modern Russia. Part 1 // Voprosy teoreticheskoy ekonomiki  (Issues of Economic Theory). No. 1. Pp. 144-157. (In Russ.).

  9. Merton R. (2006). Social theory and social structure. – M.: Guardian. (In Russ.).

  10. Nazarova YU. V. (2012). Ethics of Russian Freemasonry // Izvestiya TulGU. Gumanitarnyye nauki. Vyp. 2. – Tula: Izd-vo TulGU. Рр. 44-52. (In Russ.).

  11. Orwell J. (2003). In memory of Catalonia. Essay. – M.: Ermak. (In Russ.).

  12. Perkins J. (2014). Confessions of Economic Hit Man. – М.: Pretext. (In Russ.).

  13. Petrazhitsky L.I. (2010). Theory of Law and State in Connection with the Theory of Morality. – М.: ROSSPEN. (In Russ.).

  14. Sokolovskaya T. (1991). Masonic systems // Freemasonry in its past and present: In 2 vols. Vol. 2. – M.: SP “IKPA”. Pp. 54-55. (In Russ.).

  15. Sorokin P. (1999). Crime and punishment, feat and reward. A sociological study on the basic forms of social behavior and morality. – SPb.: RHGI. (In Russ.)

  16. Starwoman A., Gray D. (2004). Socialite, or How to Become a Girl from High Society. – M.:  Phoenix. (In Russ.).

  17. Stocker M. (1976). The Schizophrenia of Modern Ethical Theories // The Journal of Philosophy. Vol. 73. No. 14. Pp. 453-466.

  18. Jung K.G. (2023). The Relationship between the Ego and the Unconscious. – M.: AST. (In Russ.).

 

  

Manuscript submission date: 22.02.2026

Manuscript acceptance date: 19.03.2026

 

For citation:  Medushevskiy А. Virtue and Vice: Ethical Codes of Marginal Communities in Modern Russia. Part 2 // Voprosy teoreticheskoy ekonomiki. 2026. No. 2. Pp. 146–164. DOI:  10.52342/2587- 7666VTE_2026_2_146_164.